I am NOT in favour of bringing back the death sentence per se, but in certain cases I see no alternative.
In recent weeks we've heard of two UK murder cases that were so appalling that to allow the perpetrators to continue living seems almost like a crime in itself.
This (seemingly normal looking) person below is Nicholas Prosper. He murdered his Mother, his Sister, and his Brother, and, luckily, was arrested whilst on his way to commit what he called 'The Massacre of the Century' at a local school. He, apparently, wished to become the world's most famous murderer!
I have no qualms in saying that people who commit such dreadful crimes should sacrifice their own lives as a result. Instead, in liberal Britain, he will spend about 50 years in prison at the taxpayers expense.
Another young person, Kyle Clifford, recently raped and murdered his ex-Girlfriend, then went on to murder her Mother, and her Sister with a Crossbow. Totally senseless and brutal killings. He is yet another person who should automatically have surrendered his right to live, and be 'terminated'; instead of which he has also been sentenced to 'life in prison' at our expense.
On a more macabre subject, I remember well the hanging of the murderer Ruth Ellis. I was at Prep' School at the time and remember counting down the seconds, along with a crowd of other boys, to the exact time she was to hang. 9 am on the 13th July 1955. Something only nasty little schoolboys could do, but at the time it seemed warranted.
I am not suggesting brutal methods of execution. Like many dog owners I have sadly witnessed a dog being 'put to sleep'. Firstly they are given a jab that knocks them out, then another that stops the heart. The process is simple, quick, and as kind as one could imagine. There is no reason why a murderer should not be offered the same end; even though he might merit something more appropriate.
I doubt, also, if there would be many cases each year where the death sentence is warranted. But I do believe that the option should be there for judges to give in the very worst cases.
The two above are cases in point.
These cases would appear to be beyond doubt as to guilt, that is my main reservation around the death penalty, there have been too many miscarriages of justice in the past.
ReplyDeleteVery few I think. Don't forget that EVERYONE in prison is innocent.
DeleteI agree with Will that their guilt has to be beyond doubt. But why should these 2 cases above be given life behind bars. And how long is their life sentence?. 25 years. Ridiculous. Take their life away as they took others. They didn't value the lives of others. Their own life now has no value
ReplyDeleteExactly. Such people surrender their own lives when they take others.
DeleteI totally agree Cro, if there's absolutely no doubt of their guilt. Death for them would be the easy way out and would save the UK a hell of a lot of money.
ReplyDeleteIt seems logical to me. These two have no right to live.
DeleteThis is so controversial that I hesitate to comment, however I tend to agree. A life sentence is not usually for life so they will be free again sometime while their victims are gone forever.
ReplyDeletePeople who are capable of such horrors will ALWAYS be capable. There is nothing to say that they won't do it again; as have many.
DeleteTake Nicholas Prosper as an example. Surely he is mentally deranged - not in his right mind. Somewhere along the line he should have been picked up and treated or locked up in an institution for the criminally insane before he could live out his killing fantasy. Should the state execute nutters? Somehow that doesn't seem right.
ReplyDeleteWhat he was planning was insane, but he himself seemed perfectly sane. I think he was simply an evil bas*ard.
DeleteHugh Callaghan, Patrick Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny, William Power, and John Walker
ReplyDeleteDo you genuinely believe they were innocent?
DeleteI agree with your thinking.
ReplyDeleteI see it as 'logic'.
Delete